MDOI Convergence Chronicles 110.1139/CON.2026.01110
110.1139/CON.2026.01110
Article

Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review

Bahar Memarian, Tenzin Doleck 2024 Convergence Chronicles

Abstract

Background The use of Artificial Intelligence or AI is rising in higher education. With this rise, the morality of AI programs is being questioned. There is, as such, a need to understand how notions of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics or FATE are identified in the AI and higher education studies to date. Purpose This systematic review paper aims to understand definitions and studies on FATE and AI in the higher education literature. The contribution of this work is to provide a summary of FATE development and the synthesis of the challenges and potentials of each of the reviewed studies. Method A total of 33 publications from SCOPUS and Web of Science (WoS) were included in this systematic literature review. We examined definitions of FATE noted in the reviewed articles (may have been multiple in each study) and grouped them into descriptive (understandable by laypeople) and technical (containing jargon) definitions. We also examined the main FATE term studied in detail in each reviewed article and grouped them into qualitative and quantitative studies. Results Findings show more descriptive definitions exist (especially for fairness) and similarly quantitative definitions mostly emerge for Fairness. Findings also show more quantitative studies exist (especially for fairness) and qualitative definitions mostly emerge for ethics. Generally, though, there are more definitions than relevant studies conducted in the literature. Conclusion This systematic literature review offers a summary of definitions and studies conducted for FATE terms and AI in the higher education literature. Future work may benefit from bridging the gap between laypeople and experts by linking descriptive definitions with technical ones as well as qualitative studies with quantitative ones. Moreover, future work can study accountability and transparency further and make the study of FATE terms more longitudinal, open-access, and reproducible.

Identifier Metadata

Identifier 110.1139/CON.2026.01110
Canonical mdoi:110.1139/CON.2026.01110
Resolver URL https://mdoi.org/110.1139/CON.2026.01110
Resource URL Open resource
Document URL Open document
Content Type Article
Authors Bahar Memarian, Tenzin Doleck
Year 2024
Depositor Convergence Chronicles Organisation
Prefix 110.1139
Registered Aug. 17, 2026
Updated Aug. 19, 2026
Status Active
Visibility Public

Cite This Identifier

APA 7th Edition

Click to copy

MLA 9th Edition

Click to copy

Chicago 17th Edition

Click to copy

BibTeX

Click to copy

Persistent Identifier

mdoi:110.1139/CON.2026.01110

Click to copy

About MDOI

MDOI identifiers are permanent and unique identifiers assigned to digital objects to ensure long-term access, tracking, and referencing.

  • MDOI provides a permanent identity for digital objects.
  • Each MDOI is unique and points to one specific resource.
  • The prefix, such as 110.XXXX, identifies the registrant.
  • The suffix identifies the exact digital object.
  • MDOI remains stable even when a website URL changes.
  • It helps prevent broken links in digital publishing.
  • It makes academic and digital resources easier to find and cite.
  • MDOI supports proper tracking and management of digital content.
  • It improves the credibility and visibility of published resources.
  • MDOI ensures digital objects remain accessible, traceable, and reliable over time.
CO
Registered by Convergence Chronicles