MDOI Convergence Chronicles 110.0670/CON.2026.00642
110.0670/CON.2026.00642
Article

APPRAISE: A Tool for Appraising Potential for Bias in Real-World Evidence Studies on Medication Effectiveness or Safety

Katsiaryna Bykov, PharmD, ScD, Ashley Jaksa, MPH, Jennifer L. Lund, PhD, Jessica M. Franklin, PhD, Cynthia J. Girman, DrPH, Madlen Gazarian, MBBS, MSc, Hongbo Yuan, MD, MSc, PhD, Stephen Duffield, PhD, Seamus Kent, MSc, PhD, Elisabetta Patorno, MD, DrPH 2025 Convergence Chronicles

Abstract

Objectives Real-world evidence (RWE) plays an increasingly important role in health technology assessment (HTA), as well as regulatory and clinical decision making. RWE studies, however, are subject to multiple sources of bias, which are often not easy to identify, impeding credibility and inclusion of RWE in decision making. A comprehensive, fit-for-purpose, and easy-to-use bias assessment tool would help streamline RWE evaluation, enabling efficient utilization of RWE for decision making globally. Methods A working group of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology collaborated with HTA experts to develop a tool that could guide bias assessment in observational studies on the comparative safety and effectiveness of medications, building upon existing methodological tools, best practice guidelines, and checklists for the analysis of real-world data. The tool was further tested and refined in collaboration with HTA agencies. Results APPRAISE (APpraisal of Potential for Bias in ReAl-World EvIdence StudiEs) covers key domains through which bias might be introduced into an RWE study: inappropriate study design and analysis, exposure and outcome misclassification, and confounding. Each domain contains a series of questions. Responses to questions autopopulate a summary of the potential for bias within each domain and of the actions to take to avoid, mitigate, or explore the impact of bias. Conclusions APPRAISE is a tool to guide bias assessment in observational studies on medication comparative effectiveness or safety. Although the tool was designed for HTA, it will be useful for many other users of RWE and will help guide optimized RWE generation.

Identifier Metadata

Identifier 110.0670/CON.2026.00642
Canonical mdoi:110.0670/CON.2026.00642
Resolver URL https://mdoi.org/110.0670/CON.2026.00642
Resource URL Open resource
Document URL Open document
Content Type Article
Authors Katsiaryna Bykov, PharmD, ScD, Ashley Jaksa, MPH, Jennifer L. Lund, PhD, Jessica M. Franklin, PhD, Cynthia J. Girman, DrPH, Madlen Gazarian, MBBS, MSc, Hongbo Yuan, MD, MSc, PhD, Stephen Duffield, PhD, Seamus Kent, MSc, PhD, Elisabetta Patorno, MD, DrPH
Year 2025
Depositor Convergence Chronicles Organisation
Prefix 110.0670
Registered July 17, 2026
Updated July 17, 2026
Status Active
Visibility Public

Cite This Identifier

APA 7th Edition

Click to copy

MLA 9th Edition

Click to copy

Chicago 17th Edition

Click to copy

BibTeX

Click to copy

Persistent Identifier

mdoi:110.0670/CON.2026.00642

Click to copy

About MDOI

MDOI identifiers are permanent and unique identifiers assigned to digital objects to ensure long-term access, tracking, and referencing.

  • MDOI provides a permanent identity for digital objects.
  • Each MDOI is unique and points to one specific resource.
  • The prefix, such as 110.XXXX, identifies the registrant.
  • The suffix identifies the exact digital object.
  • MDOI remains stable even when a website URL changes.
  • It helps prevent broken links in digital publishing.
  • It makes academic and digital resources easier to find and cite.
  • MDOI supports proper tracking and management of digital content.
  • It improves the credibility and visibility of published resources.
  • MDOI ensures digital objects remain accessible, traceable, and reliable over time.
CO
Registered by Convergence Chronicles