MDOI Convergence Chronicles 110.0577/CON.2026.00551
110.0577/CON.2026.00551
Article

P1 Economic Burden of Recurrence among Patients with High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer who Received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the United States: A SEER-Medicare Study

Bhattacharya Rituparna, PhD,1 Fang Honghao, MS,2 Lai Yizhen, MS,1 Zhang Shujing, PhD,1 Li Jiayang, PhD,3 Shen Pangsibo, MS,3 Gao Wei, PhD,3 Song Yan, PhD,3 Dave Hema, PhD,1 Li Haojie, PhD,4 Lotan Yair, MD 2025 Convergence Chronicles

Abstract

Objectives This study assessed the impact of recurrence on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) who received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using SEER-Medicare data (2007-2020). Patients with HR-NMIBC (TisN0M0, T1N0M0, or high-grade TaN0M0) who received BCG were stratified into recurrence (i.e., patients with NMIBC recurrence, muscle-invasive bladder cancer progression, or distant metastasis) and non-recurrence cohorts. In the recurrence cohort, the index date was defined as 30 days before the first recurrence to capture recurrence-related HCRU before recurrence; in the non-recurrence cohort, the index date was randomly assigned to match the time from BCG initiation to recurrence in the recurrence cohort. Post-index all-cause HCRU, including inpatient (IP) admissions, outpatient (OP) visits, emergency department (ED) visits and skilled nursing facility (SNF) visits, and associated costs (2023 USD) were summarized on a per-patient-per-month (PPPM) basis and compared between cohorts using a generalized linear regression model. Results The study included 2,164 and 2,586 patients in recurrence and non-recurrence cohorts, respectively (median follow-up: 23.82 and 26.23 months). Significantly higher proportions of patients incurred ≥1 all-cause HCRU in recurrence vs. non-recurrence cohorts (IP: 66.2% vs. 47.9%, OP: 99.6% vs. 97.1%, ED: 54.6% vs. 45.2%, SNF: 20.7% vs. 18.0%; all p<0.05). Among patients who incurred HCRU, mean numbers of OP and ED visits PPPM were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort (OP: 2.93 vs. 1.88, ED: 0.17 vs. 0.12; both p<0.05). All-cause PPPM healthcare costs were also higher in the recurrence cohort (total: $5,058 vs. $2,207; IP: $2,472 vs. $980; OP: $1,548 vs. $504; ED: $80 vs. $41, SNF: $270 vs. $177; others: $687 vs. $505; all p<0.05).

Identifier Metadata

Identifier 110.0577/CON.2026.00551
Canonical mdoi:110.0577/CON.2026.00551
Resolver URL https://mdoi.org/110.0577/CON.2026.00551
Resource URL Open resource
Document URL Open document
Content Type Article
Authors Bhattacharya Rituparna, PhD,1 Fang Honghao, MS,2 Lai Yizhen, MS,1 Zhang Shujing, PhD,1 Li Jiayang, PhD,3 Shen Pangsibo, MS,3 Gao Wei, PhD,3 Song Yan, PhD,3 Dave Hema, PhD,1 Li Haojie, PhD,4 Lotan Yair, MD
Year 2025
Depositor Convergence Chronicles Organisation
Prefix 110.0577
Registered July 9, 2026
Updated July 9, 2026
Status Active
Visibility Public

Cite This Identifier

APA 7th Edition

Click to copy

MLA 9th Edition

Click to copy

Chicago 17th Edition

Click to copy

BibTeX

Click to copy

Persistent Identifier

mdoi:110.0577/CON.2026.00551

Click to copy

About MDOI

MDOI identifiers are permanent and unique identifiers assigned to digital objects to ensure long-term access, tracking, and referencing.

  • MDOI provides a permanent identity for digital objects.
  • Each MDOI is unique and points to one specific resource.
  • The prefix, such as 110.XXXX, identifies the registrant.
  • The suffix identifies the exact digital object.
  • MDOI remains stable even when a website URL changes.
  • It helps prevent broken links in digital publishing.
  • It makes academic and digital resources easier to find and cite.
  • MDOI supports proper tracking and management of digital content.
  • It improves the credibility and visibility of published resources.
  • MDOI ensures digital objects remain accessible, traceable, and reliable over time.
CO
Registered by Convergence Chronicles