MDOI Convergence Chronicles 110.0527/CON.2026.00501
110.0527/CON.2026.00501
Article

Cost-Utility Analysis of Antipsychotic Reduction and Discontinuation in Patients With Long-Term Schizophrenia and Psychosis in English Mental Health Trusts: The RADAR Study

George Bray, MSc, Joanna Moncrieff, PhD, Stefan Priebe, PhD, Louise Marston, PhD, Glyn Lewis, PhD, Nadia Haynes, PhD, Vanessa Pinfold, PhD, Sonia Johnson, PhD, Rachael Maree Hunter, PhD 2025 Convergence Chronicles

Abstract

Objectives The current recommended treatment for patients with recurrent episodes of schizophrenia and related conditions is antipsychotic medication. However, many antipsychotic users remain functionally impaired and experience serious physical and mental side effects. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of a gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation strategy compared with maintenance treatment over 24 months from mental health services, health and social care, and societal perspectives. Methods Nineteen mental health trusts recruited patients to the Research into Antipsychotic Discontinuation and Reduction (RADAR) randomized controlled trial. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from patient-reported EQ-5D-5L, with years of full capability calculated from the patient-reported ICECAP-A. Mental health services use and medication was collected from medical records. Other resource use and productivity loss was collected using self-completed questionnaires. Costs were calculated from published sources. Results A total of 253 participants were randomized: 126 assigned to antipsychotic dose reduction and 127 to maintenance. There were no significant differences between arms in total costs for any perspectives. There were no significant difference in quality-adjusted life-years (−0.035; 95% CI: −0.123 to 0.052), whereas years of full capability were significantly lower in the reduction arm compared with the maintenance arm (baseline-adjusted difference: −0.103; 95% CI: −0.192 to −0.014). The reduction strategy was dominated by maintenance for all analyses and was not likely to be cost-effective. Conclusions It is unlikely that gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation strategy is cost-effective compared with maintenance over 2-years for patients with schizophrenia and other recurrent psychotic disorders who are on long-term antipsychotics.

Identifier Metadata

Identifier 110.0527/CON.2026.00501
Canonical mdoi:110.0527/CON.2026.00501
Resolver URL https://mdoi.org/110.0527/CON.2026.00501
Resource URL Open resource
Document URL Open document
Content Type Article
Authors George Bray, MSc, Joanna Moncrieff, PhD, Stefan Priebe, PhD, Louise Marston, PhD, Glyn Lewis, PhD, Nadia Haynes, PhD, Vanessa Pinfold, PhD, Sonia Johnson, PhD, Rachael Maree Hunter, PhD
Year 2025
Depositor Convergence Chronicles Organisation
Prefix 110.0527
Registered July 8, 2026
Updated July 8, 2026
Status Active
Visibility Public

Cite This Identifier

APA 7th Edition

Click to copy

MLA 9th Edition

Click to copy

Chicago 17th Edition

Click to copy

BibTeX

Click to copy

Persistent Identifier

mdoi:110.0527/CON.2026.00501

Click to copy

About MDOI

MDOI identifiers are permanent and unique identifiers assigned to digital objects to ensure long-term access, tracking, and referencing.

  • MDOI provides a permanent identity for digital objects.
  • Each MDOI is unique and points to one specific resource.
  • The prefix, such as 110.XXXX, identifies the registrant.
  • The suffix identifies the exact digital object.
  • MDOI remains stable even when a website URL changes.
  • It helps prevent broken links in digital publishing.
  • It makes academic and digital resources easier to find and cite.
  • MDOI supports proper tracking and management of digital content.
  • It improves the credibility and visibility of published resources.
  • MDOI ensures digital objects remain accessible, traceable, and reliable over time.
CO
Registered by Convergence Chronicles